StoryFirst seen
The statement sets a public position that AI systems should not decide what rewards and direction shape human roles.
Everything it touches
2 names 3 voices 3 source posts
The story’s neighborhood
Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.
Follow the evidence
This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.
People should always be in control of the future. OpenAI is against the notion that it would be acceptable for people to be relegated to a role of doing things that “AI systems think makes sense to reward in humans”. People should not cede control of the future to superintelligence, and that requirement should ultimately constrain AI progress.Read original on X
Co-sign. The only future that is worth building is one in which AI remains a tool in human hands, used to elevate the human condition.Read original on X
Sam made this point precisely during our interview last week. Humans should own the future.Read original on X
OpenAI's Altman says humans must keep control of the future
OpenAI's Altman says people must stay in control of superintelligence
OpenAI's Altman says people must keep control over superintelligence
OpenAI's Altman says people must keep control over superintelligence
OpenAI's Altman says people must keep control over superintelligence
Sam Altman says people must keep control over superintelligence
Shared connections
The Yang-Mills Working Group plans to publish OpenAI's submitted code and its validation, so the claim can be checked by mathematicians.
Disney plans to use the Adobe models in its studios and at its theme parks, tailored to its own properties.
A chart from its blog suggests extra compute spent at answer time is not hitting diminishing returns.
Moving the law's author to Congress could reopen debate over whether new AI rules favor the largest companies.