StoryFirst seen

Judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

The ruling in a June lawsuit targets how Anthropic describes usage limits on its paid Claude Max plan.

Archived Updated

Everything it touches

2 names 1 voices 1 source posts

The story’s neighborhood

NAMESVOICESPOSTS

Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.

Follow the evidence

The source posts

This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.

ℏεsamLead source
remember how Anthropic got sued back in June for misleading Claude Max usage limits? I already mentioned it back in June and August. well a US judge has now ruled that the usage advertisement was “plausibly misleading”. funny timing how Anthropic just LAST WEEK renamed its 20x plan to Ultra and clarified the weekly usage. for context, the $200 Max 20x plan was advertised 4x more usage than the $100 Max 5x plan, but the 4x multiplier was only applied to the 5-hour limit, not the total weekly limit. it’s clarified on their website now but back in August many users just started realizing what the 4x actually meant.
Read original on X

How the headline evolved

  1. Judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

  2. Judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

  3. US judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

  4. US judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

  5. Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads found plausibly misleading

  6. Judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

  7. Judge finds Anthropic's Claude Max usage ads plausibly misleading

Shared connections

Related stories