StoryFirst seen
It ranks near the top at $4.04 per task, behind three rival models in the same evaluation.
Everything it touches
14 names 1 voices 1 source posts
The story’s neighborhood
Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.
Follow the evidence
This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.
We've evaluated Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon on FrontierCode 2.0, our coding benchmark that measure's a model's ability to go beyond the spec. Gemini 4 Carbon scores near SOTA with a score of 40% and a cost of $4.04 per task, behind Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Sonnet 5.5. Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% with a cost of $6.41 per task, ahead of Muse Wonder 1.0, but behind Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7. See the leaderboard with full scores:Read original on X
Gemini Carbon model scores 40% on FrontierCode coding benchmark
Gemini Carbon model scores 40% on FrontierCode coding benchmark
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 40% on FrontierCode coding benchmark
Gemini 4 Carbon nears top score on FrontierCode coding benchmark
Gemini 4 Carbon nears top coding score on FrontierCode benchmark
Gemini 4 Carbon nears SOTA on FrontierCode 2.0 at 40%
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 40% on FrontierCode 2.0 coding benchmark
Shared connections
Both new models are available now, giving developers and businesses fresh options from a leading AI lab.
The models are pitched at harder coding, reasoning, and vision work, which matters to developers and businesses choosing which models to build on.
Users reported hitting full usage limits before the reset, which came as fixes were being shipped.
Developers who built workflows on the bot are being asked to send feedback as the changes roll out.